Saturday, October 24, 2009

 

Why, oh Why Do we Have to Keep on Putting the Clocks Back?

[Last year, about this time, I expressed my indignation at the absurd putting back of clocks every year by that precious hour. I have not heard one single person in favour of this measure-well one, anyway; see comment box- which continues to shroud in gloom a period of the year which does not need any more more gloom than it already has. So I'm republishing my post of last October and intend to do so until this ridiculous outdated practice is done away with(I know, I know).]

No doubt most people in this country have felt the first chill of autumn as recent unseasonably warm temperatures begin to give way. This reminder that winter is at hand is bad enough but what astonishes me is our government's insistence on putting the clocks back by an hour; this year it's on 25th October.

The case against this joyless annual donning of a temporal hair shirt is as follows:

i) studies show that while there might be more accidents in the mornings these would be more than compensated for by fewer in the evenings; The Guardian some time ago, quoted studies predicting a net saving of 140 lives.

ii) 80 per cent of the population want to keep summer time throughout the year.

iii) Many influential pressure groups favour it, including the CBI, the Police and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents.

iv) the experiment of maintaining BST through the winter 1968-71 was, as far as I recall, a substantial success.

v) It would extend the tourist season, the sporting season and..., perhaps most important of all it would make us all feel a damn sight better about the miserable imminence of winter.

The case against reversing the measure is summed up in the two words: Scottish farmers. They would face much darker mornings as the sun would not rise until 10.0am. However, against this it can be adduced:

i) The rate of decline in accidents would actually be greater in Central Scotland(5.5%) than in the south of England(2.5%).

ii)When I used to visit Northern Sweden regularly, farmers up there did not see daylight until much later than 10.0am and accepted it as part of their cost for living in that latitude.

iii) Now Scotland has its own parliament, why doesn't it set its own regional time and do us all a big favour?

iv) is it fair that a nation of 60 million should suffer merely because a few hundred farmers should be able to see their cows more clearly on a winter's morning?

In the war we had a clocks turned forward two hours- Double Summer Time!- why not return to those good old days? Brown might even find his recently flagging popularity recovering immensely if he introduced this simple yet highly popular measure.

Comments:
Hi Skipper

"I have not heard one single person in favour of this measure".

Here is my comment from last year again:

"Then I'm afraid I'm going to be the first - personally I prefer lighter mornings.

I have several reasons for this. One is purely selfish - normally I am out and about in the morning and then work through the afternoon and evening.

I know that there is talk of how the change would improve safety on the roads - personally I don't quite see it, as I think it would probably make it safer to drive around at night, more dangerous in the morning when people tend to be less alert.

Finally as a main argument, we put the clocks back to GMT - the correct time according to our geographical position, which we can't actually do anything about. I am aware that GMT is technically only correct for London and c.20 minutes out in Truro, but I think it is still better to be more or less in sync with the earth.

I don't think it's a desperately important issue, and I don't mind being in a small minority - but that's what I think anyway."

Maybe a small modification of the opening blurb would be in order? Sorry to be pedantic! :-)
 
I totally agree Bill and was going to post something similar. You've saved me the bother!

Also, think of all the time wasted by people having to reset the times on videos, alarm clocks, cars etc. etc.

It's silly to put everyone through this twice a year and as you point out there would be lives saved because of it too.
 
Yawn what time is it.
 
I'm a single-mum shift worker - I enjoy the rare treat of an extra hour in bed.
 
Linda
But it's only for one night! What about the other six months of miserable gloom?
 
Hi Skip. Agree completely. And as for farmers complaining about needing to milk their cows, I have never seen nor heard of any cow who could read a clock. If the cows are ready for milking at dawn then farmers should simply get on with it. Dawn occurs at dawn regardless of what the clocks say.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?