Wednesday, October 29, 2008

 

Ross and Brand Will Only Benefit From 'Ansafonegate'


I used to admire and quite like Jonathan Ross when he first appeared on the media as a very quick witted and funny guy. Then I found his relentlesss smuttiness-and I quite like smutty jokes by the way- began to pall. The way he inevitably directed every interview around to his subject's sex life, I thought to be reflect a poverty of his own personality rather than the sychopantic millions who listened, watched and paid his enormous salary.

I recall him asking Martina Navratilova if she used to have sex before she went on court to play tennis at Wimbledon; the obvious subtext was that he was fishing for tawdry details of her well known sexual preferences. But the interview which caused me never to watch the pillock again was with David Cameron when he suggested, that, when at Eton, Cameron might have masturbated over pictures of Margaret Thatcher. Brand, I know less well but had found him intelligent and potentially funny until this latest event.

The current scandal about the leaving of obscene messages on the ansaphone of near 'National Treasure', Andrew Sachs was spectacularly misjudged and the widespread kicking they have received from every quarter has been richly deserved, as is their suspension by ther Beeb. However the biggest loser from all this is the corporation itself, already facing problems with its future funding. This will have substantially weakened its case for continued state funding at present levels. But the sad thing is, both Ross and Brand will not suffer at all.

I realise I'm moving right into Victor Meldrew- 'old fart' territory here, but their kind of celebrity thrives on becoming and remaining media 'enfant terribles'. Even if the BBC sacks them for good, their market value will have gone up rather than down and they won't be unemployed for more than five minutes. I fear they merely reflect the infantile consciousness of a significant portion of the British listening and viewing public.

Comments:
Skipper - You omit to point out that the real villains of the piece here are the producer, programme editor and controller who decided that this pre-recorded programme should be broadcast.

If the programme was indeed so offensive to people, it's their heads that should roll.

Though I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if the two attention-seeking celeb presenters get the chop as well.

But you're right - they will probably thrive on the publicity.
 
They're getting on a bit to be 'enfants terribles', particularly Ross - he comes across more like a 'dirty old man' these days.
 
What a thoroughly despicable character Jonathan Ross is, not only has he behaved like complete trash in making evil taunts to a respected old actor but now he is behaving like a real bully boy threatning to sue the BBC. Over the last two years I have lost all respect for the BBC and if they don't get rid of that Ross thug I really think it is time for the BBC itself to go, they have dragged this country through the mud. They should be ashamed of having given him a show in the first place.
 
What a thoroughly despicable character Jonathan Ross is, not only has he behaved like complete trash in making evil taunts to a respected old actor but now he is behaving like a real bully boy threatning to sue the BBC. Over the last two years I have lost all respect for the BBC and if they don't get rid of that Ross thug I really think it is time for the BBC itself to go, they have dragged this country through the mud. They should be ashamed of having given him a show in the first place.
 
I agree with you about Ross, but the sad truth is that there were Tory Boys at uni in the 80s who used to w**k over Margaret Thatcher. I think Ross's question was probably trying to tease out a broader point - whether she was an object of worship for DC in the way she was for so many others of his political generation.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?