Thursday, May 17, 2007
A Result of which Stalin Would Have Been Proud
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68b23/68b232dbb28a2d1ac5cf580838877b32f6e433da" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98b04/98b04664549eac1fa0cf72cbe6ede4c02e1fb017" alt=""
John McConnell had the temerity to ask if Gordon would 'lend' him enough MP names to provide the party with an election but was dismissed with something approaching contempt. It would not even have been a proper fight- the result being a foregone conclusion- but it would have usefully ventilated a few issues concerned with management of the public services, the Iraq War and relations with the USA. The party needs to discuss post Blair issues within its won ranks.
As a party member I feel a bit cheated I have to say; we have few enough privileges but voting in leadership elections once in a decade, I'd begun to think was one of them. If he wanted to side-step such a tiny hurdle, Brown must indeed be as paranoid and as unconcerned with the requirements of democratic debate as the autocrat with whom Sir Andrew Turnbull(he can forget any retirement work for the next two years by the way)compared him.
Comments:
<< Home
Don't worry, many of us who are interested bystanders but not actually involved in politics think it's hilarious that Labour MPs can't see that a "vote" for Brown is a vote for losing the next General Election!
Effectively they have reverted to the old way of electing the leader; by the PLP. The other sections of the Electoral College have no say whatsoever.
Marsha Singh was on both Meacher's and McDonnell's lists but was counted as a Mad Mike-ite. Not the story it has been spun as.
We need to the other sections of the party empowered to take part in the case of a vacancy.
Post a Comment
We need to the other sections of the party empowered to take part in the case of a vacancy.
<< Home