Tuesday, March 28, 2006
Blair and the Melbourne interview: slip or declaration?
The reasons for him to go are legion but lets identify a few of the major ones:
i) the debacle into which Iraq has evolved;
ii) the lying over WMD as the reason for invading-most of this emerging out of the David Kelly affair;
iii) the flagrant ignoring of opinion at home and in his party over the issue, especially over his overcosy relationship with a rightwing US president;
iv) the reliance on Conservative votes to pass the Education Bill's 2nd reading;
v) the retention of Tessa Jowell in his Cabinet when it seems clear she must have known about her husband's dodgy gift from Berlusconi- (his job as a high paid tax avoider for the super rich also upsets Guardian reading Labour supporters);
vi) the peerages for loans scandal which has seemed finally to rank Labour alongside Major's governmment for sleazy seediness.
In addition to this we had Jackie Ashley's column in The Guardian yesterday which argued the Melbourne comment was not involuntary but was a clear signal Blair intends to stay as long as he can. She interprets it as a signal to people like Charles Clarke to hang on until they have a chance of besting Brown in a contest. She believes he is now-rather, one supposes, like Churchill with Eden, Macmillan with Butler-actively seeking to deny the crown to its most obvious, and deserving heir. She declares the 'battle is well and truly joined' and urges Brown to 'pick up the gauntlet'.
Against this can be adduced:
i) Ashley is probably a Brown supporter and desperately wants Blair gone;
ii) Blair has possibly reached the point- the nadir- when his popularity is so low he can afford to ignore further criticism and rely on his enemies being too scared to spill the blood a 'decapitation attempt' would reliably cause;
iii) Will Hutton in the Observer, 26th March argues staunchly in favour of Blair:
a) Dromey and the NEC should have known something of the provenance of the £18m needed to fight the last election. At least Blair stepped up and accepted some responsibility;
b) the left are quick to criticise Blair but offer no 'coherent alternative';
c) Brown is 'New Labour through and through' so would be little different from Blair;
d) Blair is right to champion entrepreneurialism and has 'overseen a fundamental shift to the benefit of ordinary people';
e) 'Blair remains... the great persuader and the man who created the new coalition. If he's prepared to carry on soaking up the punishment, the liberal left should be grateful.'
One might also add that to me Blair's comment did not sound like a declaration of war but merely something added as an afterthought.
How could they know Will/Skipper, if it was being kept secret from them?
We still don't know (do we?) in which account the money was kept, and who put it there.
I'm only quoting Hutton here, not endorsing what he says. But it is a bit odd, is it not, that the Treasurer of the party was presumably signing off cheques for millions of pounds during the election without any idea of where the money had originated? Is this good practice? Would not a competent guy have investigated there and then?
Judged from this standpoint, his protestations begin to sound a little like those of a certain Mrs Tessa Mills who also 'knew nothing' about the then money coming into the household.
Dromey is a busy guy, people compartmentalise, politicians constantly change and re-master complex briefs, and things, inmportant to the outsider, do slip.
I've been married for many years to an extremely wealthy woman but money, where it comes from, what provides it, are never mentioned. That is the way of the wealthy.
Check out why Blair supported Bush. A buddy from the State Department suggested Bush threateded to derail the Good Friday Agreement. Another contact who served in Thatcher's cabinet argued cogently that Blair had to invent WDM simply to haul along (real) Labour backbenchers.
Cheers, your comments are valuable.
replica louis vuitton handbag
how to get cash advance from your paycheck
advance cash loan payday quick
guaranteed loan personal quick
no fax payday advance
advance advance cash loan loan paycheck payday
payday loan lender
emergency fax loan no payday
home loan calculation
credit free online report score
buy generic phentermine
atarax hydroxyzine medication
extra cheap phentermine
you have a unique opportunity only today to receive insurance the machine free of charge
texas car insurance
texas car insurance
car insurance quotes
car insurance quotes
car insurance policy
car insurance policy
I have read through one history
Each of you has your personal story; it is your history. Keeping a diary or writing your feelings in a special notebook is a wonderful way to learn how to think and write about who you are -- to develop your own identity and voice.
People of all ages are able to do this. Your own history is special because of your circumstances: your cultural, racial, religious or ethnic background. Your story is also part of human history, a part of the story of the dignity and worth of all human beings. By putting opinions and thoughts into words, you, too, can give voice to your inner self and strivings.
A long entry by Anne Frank on April 5, 1944, written after more than a year and a half of hiding from the Nazis, describes the range of emotions 14-year-old Anne is experiencing:
". . . but the moment I was alone I knew I was going to cry my eyes out. I slid to the floor in my nightgown and began by saying my prayers, very fervently. Then I drew my knees to my chest, lay my head on my arms and cried, all huddled up on the bare floor. A loud sob brought me back down to earth, and I choked back my tears, since I didn't want anyone next door to hear me . . .
"And now it's really over. I finally realized that I must do my school work to keep from being ignorant, to get on in life, to become a journalist, because that's what I want! I know I can write. A few of my stories are good, my descriptions of the Secret Annex are humorous, much of my diary is vivid and alive, but . . . it remains to be seen whether I really have talent . . .
"When I write I can shake off all my cares. My sorrow disappears, my spirits are revived! But, and that's a big question, will I ever be able to write something great, will I ever become a journalist or a writer? I hope so, oh, I hope so very much, because writing allows me to record everything, all my thoughts, ideals and fantasies.
"I haven't worked on Cady's Life for ages. In my mind I've worked out exactly what happens next, but the story doesn't seem to be coming along very well. I might never finish it, and it'll wind up in the wastepaper basket or the stove. That's a horrible thought, but then I say to myself, "At the age of 14 and with so little experience, you can't write about philosophy.' So onward and upward, with renewed spirits. It'll all work out, because I'm determined to write! Yours, Anne M. Frank
For those of you interested in reading some of Anne Frank's first stories and essays, including a version of Cady's Life, see Tales From the Secret Annex (Doubleday, 1996). Next: Reviewing and revising your writing
Finally! A new pill that really works!
Our others products, more info here:
Ultra Allure Pheromones
Links to this post: